Search | Site Info | Site Map

MENU

HOMEPAGE

Animal Health/
Welfare/Zoonoses

Environment

Land Reform

Social/
Economic/
Political

Food

Science

Fishing

Tourism

Education

Cultybraggan
Farm

Trade

Book Reviews

Light Relief

Links

Glossary

Correspondence

Vacancies

Contact Us

Get Acrobat Reader

 

 

Back to TB Homepage disease

Tuberculosis in cattle and badgers:
disease control, ethics and welfare

Review of SCAWS workshop, Moredun Research Institute,
Edinburgh 19 October 20006

Part 1: Introduction

Dr James Irvine

FRSE DSc FRCP(Ed) FRCPath(Lond) FInstBiol

Teviot Scientific at Cultybraggan Farm, Perthshire and at Edinburgh

Filed 20 Nov 06
©www.land-care.org.uk

The Scottish Centre for Animal Welfare Sciences (SCAWS) organised a workshop on the highly topical and vexatious topic of tuberculosis in cattle and in badgers, and the relationship between the two. The subject is highly vexatious because the prevalence of tuberculosis (bTB) in certain parts of England, euphemistically referred to as "hot spots", has escalated over the years to truly alarming proportions (figure 1). It has also been well established for decades that badgers are susceptible to tuberculosis and that they favour livestock woodlands and farmland for their habitat.

bTB testing intervals for cattle, 2005
These reflect the the bTb "hot spot" areas in the UK.
These areas have dramatically increased in size over the past 10 years
(Source: defra)
(To enlarge: Click Here)

 

Although they are no longer rare or under threat, badgers in the UK are a protected species. Under the banners of "animal welfare" and "wildlife conservation" certain lobby groups have whipped up public emotion in the UK to such an extent that major problems have been created that now face attempts to implement rational disease control, both in terms of the cattle and of the badgers. As the Chairman of the Workshop, Sir Colin Spedding, said in his introduction

"decisions made on the basis of emotion are seldom right".

He also said

"solutions based on a single focus are seldom right"

Sadly, it is also a fact that certain so-called animal welfare groups have misinformed the public through making statements which were claimed to be based on good science when they were not. A clear example was illustrated by one of the speakers at the workshop.

It is also of note that the Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) recently upheld the complaint against a national press advert for the RSPCA which featured a picture of a group of badgers and stated (1):

"The badger is a protected species. Apart from the thousands that the government is thinking of slaughtering obviously. The main cause of the spread of TB in cows is cattle-to-cattle, not badger-to-cattle. So what are some farmers putting pressure on the government to do about it? That's right, slaughter thousands of badgers.....'

Against his background the Workshop, supported by the British Veterinary Welfare Foundation and the British Society for Animal Science, attempted to advance the situation by bringing together speakers from

  • an affected dairy farm,

  • a badger ecologist,

  • an animal welfare physiologist who had experience of the control of
    tuberculosis infected possums in New Zealand,

  • a vet practicing in a bTB area in Devon,

  • a former Chief Veterinary officer, and finally

  • an agricultural economist who was a member of the controversial Independent Science Group (ISG) that has been involved in what appears to some to be never-ending and unsatisfactory trials relating to bTB control.

With this mix it should be possible to get a better picture of what is going on in the UK and to put this into perspective with what has happened - or is happening - elsewhere in Europe and the rest of the world.

This website intends to run a series of articles reviewing the presentations of each of the five speakers at the workshop, and to conclude with an overall picture of the situation, that is currently confused by high emotion and strong political lobbying from single focus positions. Nevertheless, it is necessary to urgently address the problem as it has serious consequences both to the livestock industry and to the environment.

©www.land-care.org.uk

The above article is the first in a series
covering each speaker's contribution to the conference