| Back
to SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL Homepage
Land management - a mix of stewardship.
The Assynt Community buyout
Paper presented at the SCA annual conference
"Who should run the countryside? Rural Scotland
2006"
Royal Highland Centre, Ingliston, Edinburgh
25th April 2006
Alastair Macaskill
Chairman, The Assynt Foundation
Filed 18 May 06
©www.land-care.org.uk
Mr Chairman, ladies & gentlemen, thank you for giving me the
opportunity to speak to you today.
The theme of your conference is “Who Should
Run the Countryside” and in typical fashion, I will not directly
answer the question, although I hope what I have to say will at
least provide you with some food for thought. Each one of us comes
here today carrying the baggage of preconceived ideas and our prejudices,
you heard some of them, and if we can succeed in removing some then
the conference has not been in vain.
I am reminded of an occasion many years ago, the
scene is set in Eden Court at Inverness. The conference had been
arranged to discuss the proposed formation of Community Councils.
I was present at it wearing my “Police Community Involvement”
hat. There were three speakers, two of whom were academics and the
third was my good friend, the late Alastair Brackloch. I met Alastair
in the front foyer of Eden Court, and when he saw that his audience
could be counted in hundreds instead of tens, to say he was apprehensive
is somewhat of an understatement. I did the only honourable thing
and retired to the bar with him and, during the brief lull as the
barman filled and refilled our glasses, we discussed matters.
The first speaker produced a well-reasoned argument
that Community Councils should be an extension of local government,
while the second speaker saw them as a pressure group. Lastly Alastair
spoke, and he said, “In Lochinver they could have a meeting
of Assynt Community Council, Assynt Angling Club, Assynt Games Committee
and he listed several others: the only difference being that occasionally
we would need to change the chairman.
Alastair Macaskill
Chairman, The Assynt Foundation
Photo©Kimpton Graphics
In that respect, nothing has changed in Assynt
as each of our Directors are members of other organisations. I view
this as one of our strengths, as it keeps the wider community abreast
of developments. In my youth, Assynt Estate was pivotal to the financial
well-being of the Parish. They employed all trades in-house. Numerous
people were employed as gamekeepers, shepherds, ghillies and kennel
boys. In addition, a housekeeper and domestic staff were employed
all year at the lodge. Office staff were also employed. Over them
all the factor ruled, and he kept the local populace in check by
threatening to remove them from the venison list. Everybody in the
community got a piece of venison, but if you moved out of place
you were removed from the list.
Over the decades, part of the estates were sold
and employment opportunities markedly decreased. As a community
we were faced with the situation of Glencanisp and Drumrunie being
offered for sale. The Highlands are littered with traditional estates
having been sold to those alien to our culture and way of life,
and whom it is next to impossible to contact if a land problem arises.
In addition to this, recent statistical information
has been released which shows the increased value of sporting estates.
We’ve already been given examples of the financial input that’s
needed to keep them running. So to my mind what this is saying is,
"Buy a Highland estate, do nothing with it, and you are more
or less guaranteed an above-inflation return on your money".
Sterility equates to negative growth. For too long the Highlands
have languished as a play-area.
At this stage I wish to make it clear that I do
not consider myself as a radical on a mission, but I am someone
who cares passionately for the well-being of Assynt.
I would here like to pay tribute to the Vestey
family, the selling agents and their legal team for the courtesy
extended during negotiations. This is not said in a patronising
fashion, for not only am I aware of the benevolence which the Vestey
family have shown to the Parish over many decades, but I am also
due them a debt of gratitude for my personal dealings with them
over the years.
The fact was that the land was going up for sale,
the Vestey era was over and I believe no longer should the community
be subjected to the lottery of who should succeed.
What next?
I have just about completed negotiations with
Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH). You will say, “So what? Private
landlords have been making such arrangements for decades.”
Hitherto such arrangements were between the private landlord and
SNH. Only if the land was under crofting tenure was a section of
the community consulted, but normally the agreement was a fait
accompli. The agreement reached is one not in the interest
of an individual, but in the interest of the wider community.
I listened with interest to what Ian Jardine had
to say. I can say that the kind of document that I have bears little
resemblance to the first one that was delivered to me.
The main thrust of my argument was that the Land
Reform Act places a statutory obligation on
a community to achieve social, economic and environmental objectives.
At times one becomes exasperated when we hear of plants, which they
would have us believe existed in pre-creation times, which we need
to have protected. No group of people exists that cares for and
has cared for our wonderful landscape like the indigenous people.
The agreement reached has taken into account the environmental objectives
of Drumrunie Estate and the SSSIs while agreeing to Sustainable
Development of the rest of our lands.
A Deer Management Agreement is another matter
which we have concluded. This not only recognises the need for a
reduction in deer numbers, but also the need to keep the herd at
a level so that it does not impact drastically on neighbouring estates.
One of our neighbouring private landlords has agreed to act as an
independent assessor.
It has been said that “idealism can be directly
measured in proportion to the person’s distance from the problem,”
but like Martin Luther King “I have a dream.”
We are actively examining the provision of affordable
housing; my own preference is for shared ownership with the right
of pre-emption, so that the housing stock remains affordable in
perpetuity. In conjunction with this we will examine a biomass district
heating scheme, the fuel being provided by the tenants of the Forestry
Crofts, which we hope to establish at Ledbeg. As Capital Growth
and obscene profits have been removed from the equation and the
need to financially wash one’s face substituted instead, this
type of partnership arrangement is now possible.
We are currently looking for partnership agreements
in order to be at the cutting edge of technological advances in
the biomass and biofuels business. On a weekly, if not daily basis,
members of the public are coming forward with business ideas. I
am hopeful that at least three small businesses will have commenced
before the year ends.
In Assynt, as has been already mentioned, we are
faced with a unique and challenging set of circumstances. The land
we are custodians of has little or no road access to it. An established
income stream was not acquired when the land was purchased. Despite
these handicaps, the community still backed us in acquiring the
estates. I think that it is important to emphasise a public ballot
was held. Unfortunately I don’t have the figures to hand,
but, we had about a 70-80% return on the ballot, and of those that
were returned, we had about 70-odd-percent in favour. I think it
will stand on its own in terms of a democratic decision.
As far as Assynt Foundation itself is concerned,
for the princely sum of £1 anybody who is resident within
the parish and is on the voters role can join and have a full democratic
say in the running of it. All of us are elected to office by means
of a public ballot.
I have given you some of our vision, but - as
previously mentioned - we are in a penurious state. Accordingly
I have with me some associated member forms which you can complete
to participate in our future success. You will also receive a regular
newsletter which will let you know how much of my dream has turned
into reality.
You could have someone standing here today who
could articulate better than I the cause of community land ownership.
But what I’m quite confident of is that you could not have
anyone standing before you today who is more passionate for the
well being of Assynt.
I will conclude by reminding you of the well-known
phrase – take care of Assynt and Scotland will take care of
itself.
Thank you.
©www.land-care.org.uk
Further reading recommended by Land-Care
Andrews,
Tony (2006)." Who should run the countryside? Rural Scotland
2006."
4th Annual Conference, Royal Highland Centre, Ingliston, Edinburgh,
25th April 2006
See SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL Homepage, filed 04 May 06,
www.land-care.org.uk Click
Here to View
Hoey,
Kate (2006). Chairman, Countryside Alliance. "Who should run
the countryside? Rural Scotland 2006."
4th Annual Conference, Royal Highland Centre, Ingliston, Edinburgh,
25th April 2006
See SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL Homepage, filed 08 May 06,
www.land-care.org.uk Click
Here to View
Stevenson,
Struan (2006). "Big government in the countryside". 4th
Annual Conference, Royal Highland Centre, Ingliston, Edinburgh,
25th April 2006: "Who should run the countryside? Rural Scotland
2006".
See SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL Homepage, filed 09 May 06,
www.land-care.org.uk Click
Here to View
Miers,
Tom (2006). Chief Executive, The Policy Institute. "Who should
run the countryside? Rural Scotland 2006."
4th Annual Conference, Royal Highland Centre, Ingliston, Edinburgh,
25th April 2006
See SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL Homepage, filed 15 May 06,
www.land-care.org.uk Click
Here to View
Jardine,
Ian (2006). Chief Executive, Scottish Natural Heritage. "Who
should run the countryside? Rural Scotland 2006."
4th Annual Conference, Royal Highland Centre, Ingliston, Edinburgh,
25th April 2006
See SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL Homepage, filed 16 May 06,
www.land-care.org.uk Click
Here to View
Robertson,
Gordon (2006). Land management - a mix of stewardship. Honesty,
reality and accountability.
Paper presented at the SCA 4th annual conference "Who should
run the countryside? Rural Scotland 2006." Royal Highland Centre,
Ingliston, Edinburgh 25th April 2006
See SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL Homepage, filed 17 May 06,
www.land-care.org.uk Click
Here to View
Acknowledgements and Disclaimer
Land-Care is grateful to Tony Andrews, CEO
Scottish Countryside Alliance, and to Dick Playfair of Playfair
Walker for the invitation to attend the conference in a media capacity,
the opportunity to participate in both formal and informal discussion,
and for their help in providing Land-Care with transcripts of the
papers presented.
No responsibility for errors or omissions
in the transcription process can be taken by SCA, Playfair Walker
or Land-Care.
Kimpton Graphics is a division of Land-Care.
Finis
|