Search | Site Info | Site Map

MENU

HOMEPAGE

Animal Health/
Welfare/Zoonoses

Environment

Land Reform

Social/
Economic/
Political

Food

Science

Fishing

Tourism

Education

Cultybraggan
Farm

Trade

Book Reviews

Light Relief

Links

Glossary

Correspondence

Vacancies

Contact Us

Get Acrobat Reader

 

 

Back to SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL Homepage

The regrettable actions of the
Executive of the Scottish Beef Council towards the National Beef Association

James Irvine

Teviot Scientific, Cultybraggan Farm, Comrie, Perthshire

Filed 30th Mar 06
©www.land-care.org.uk

It was sad to read the front page of The Scottish Farmer, 25th March 2006

"Only Scot on NBA board is ousted".

It was particularly sad because it is quite right that he should be ousted.

The good news is that there is now an opportunity for him to be replaced by someone who has a more constructive agenda.

This was no repeat of Jim Walker's ousting from the chairmanship of Quality Meat Scotland. Whatever the rights or wrongs of that debacle, the ousting of Keith Redpath from the National Beef Association Board as its Scottish representative is well founded.

The Scottish Beef Council (SBC) is the Scottish branch of the National Beef Association (NBA). I am a member of the committee of the SBC and I believe I have attended every meeting of that committee during the past 11 months. It has become increasingly apparent that a group among the current and previous office bearers have been following an agenda of their own to cause trouble with, and disruption of, relationships between the SBC and the NBA HQ, with the intention of forming a separate group of their own. This is distinctly unhelpful at a time when it is essential that the UK beef industry holds together, pooling what resources it has to get the beef industry back on track, both at home and abroad.

Members of the SBC committee were repeatedly asked by the chairman of SBC to respect the confidentiality of committee business. It was therefore disappointing that Keith Redpath and others allegedly talked directly to the press, making statements that I for one do not recall being the consensus of those present at the relevant committee meetings. What was also clear was the lack of any significant attempt to inform the Scottish membership of the NBA what was going on, although committee members asked them to do so. The letter sent by the chairman of SBC to Scottish members encouraging them not to pay their NBA subscriptions to the NBA, but to a separate bank account, and stating that the SBC was withholding support for the NBA, did not have the formal approval of the committee, as I recall. The reason given by the executive for such an action was alleged mismanagement of the NBA finances of which there is, as far as I can ascertain, no real substance.

This small group, drawn from present and past office bearers of the SBC, have recently gone much further in breaking their own rules regarding confidentiality of committee or board room business. They issued a press release dated 24th March 2006 about the board meeting of the NBA (1), and would appear to have talked to the Scottish Farmer before that to enable it to carry the story on its front page on the next day.

The NBA responded with a newsletter dated 27th March addressed to all the Scottish members of the NBA. Permission from the NBA has been granted to this website to reproduce the relevant part (2).

In the recent Scottish Farmer article, Keith Redpath is quoted as saying

"We are ready to do our thing in Scotland. We have had enough and are sick of all the aggro and hassle"

But truth to tell, it is Keith Redpath and his cronies that are causing very damaging disruption. "Our thing" appears to be an ambition to run a separate organisation themselves. Indeed, we read in the press that they have now come up with a name for it, all without the agreement of the SBC committee, let alone consulting the Scottish NBA members.

There should be no reason why the Scottish members of the NBA cannot work in conjunction with NBA members in other parts of the UK, thereby achieving the ability to lobby the Scottish Executive while others lobby DEFRA and Brussels with pooled resources. The structure of the NBA recognises the different needs of the different countries that make up the UK. In Robert Forster, the NBA has a Chief Executive who is a first class communicator and lobbyist with the interests of the beef industry throughout the UK at heart. We need a separate Scottish body like a hole in the head.

Well, it is a free country. If Redpath and his associates will not co-operate constructively with the NBA as a UK organisation (or indeed with the SBC committee), then they are at liberty to set up whatever other organisation they like. Hopefully, few will follow them. The rest of us can get on and repair the damage they have been doing. On admittedly scant resources, the NBA HQ continues to do a tremendous amount of good work on behalf of the beef industry in the UK, including Scotland.

The next committee meeting of the SBC is on 6th April at 6.00 pm at United Auctions Perth. I understand that any Scottish member of the NBA is entitled to attend as an observer, but this should be checked with the chairman.

Don't knock the NBA, join it.

©www.land-care.org.uk

References

1. NBA Scottish Region Press Statement 23rd March 2006 Click Here to View pdf

2. NBA's response to last week's press statement by Scottish office holders Click Here to View pdf