Search | Site Info | Site Map

MENU

HOMEPAGE

Animal Health/
Welfare/Zoonoses

Environment

Land Reform

Social/
Economic/
Political

Food

Science

Fishing

Tourism

Education

Cultybraggan
Farm

Trade

Book Reviews

Light Relief

Links

Glossary

Correspondence

Vacancies

Contact Us

Get Acrobat Reader

 

 

Back to SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL Homepage

A major relief if Brown would give art a break

Magnus Linklater

Columnist, Scotland on Sunday

Filed 31 Jul 06
©Magnus Linklater

This article, which was originally published in the Review section of
Scotland on Sunday on 30th July 2006, is reproduced on Land-Care
with the kind permission of the author and the newspaper


WE don't know how much Gordon Brown knows about art, but we know what he doesn't like: he has so far fended off all attempts to introduce US-style tax breaks to encourage rich patrons to support the arts.

Art galleries and museums across America benefit enormously from generous gifts in the form of pictures and donations because all such patronage is tax-free. It is a system which has altered the whole culture of giving, and it could do the same here. Thus far, however, the Iron Chancellor has proved implacable. The few modest tax-relief reforms he has allowed have produced encouraging results. But a bolder approach is needed - and nowhere more so than in Scotland.

A letter just circulated by the National Art Collection Fund paints a bleak picture of the funds available to museums and galleries in the UK for purchasing works of art - they have fallen by 90% over the past decade. Last year the Heritage Lottery Fund spent less than 1% of its budget on buying art and income to the National Heritage Memorial Fund, the 'last resort' source for heritage objects at risk, has dropped by 40%.

In Scotland, the combined annual fund available for all the National Galleries for acquisitions is just £1.25m. For the National Museums, it is £500,000. For the museums of Glasgow and provincial galleries, the National Fund is just over £200,000, a figure frozen for the past 10 years.

Since local authorities are, at best, unreliable patrons, it means that many galleries have simply stopped buying pictures. True, Scotland's acquisition funds are ring-fenced, unlike in England, but against a background of rocketing art market prices, the money available is desperately thin.

John Leighton, the new director of the National Galleries of Scotland, says things have got harder in the past five years, largely because prices have been forced up by galleries in the US and the Far East, as well as by a new generation of 'super-collectors', including oil-rich Russian billionaires.

He has, of course, a hard act to follow. His predecessor, Sir Timothy Clifford, was an acquisitive collector, adept at finding pockets of unspent government money and persuading rich donors and art funds to help him buy iconic works by Botticelli, Titian, Canova and El Greco. His remarkable farewell exhibition, Choice, showed just how a small gallery by international standards could punch above its weight.

Since, at the same time, Richard Calvocoressi at the Gallery of Modern Art was quietly acquiring major examples from the collections of Roland Penrose and Gabrielle Keillor, the past 20 years have been something of a golden era.

The Scottish Executive has shown itself willing to help out when major works are being acquired to a far greater extent than the government at Westminster, but whether that generosity will continue remains to be seen.

I have no doubt that Leighton, with his recent experience at the Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam, where he greatly expanded the collection, will be every bit as ambitious as Clifford. However, the emphasis may well shift from Old Masters to more modern acquisitions - such as the Douglas Gordon film about Zinedine Zidane, whose acquisition for £70,000 was announced last week.

But Leighton needs all the help he can get. It would be unthinkable, for instance, for Scotland to lose the collection of Titians, Raphaels, Poussins and other pictures on loan from the Duke of Sutherland. Though secure at present, they may need to be purchased some time in the future.

And there are other great pictures in private hands, collected by Scottish families, and part of our heritage, which might one day come onto the market - such as the Treasures of Lennoxlove, an exhibition of pictures, furniture and art objects from the home of the Duke of Hamilton opening tomorrow at the auctioneers Lyon and Turnbull in Edinburgh.

This is where the Chancellor comes in. Mr Brown has in front of him a report, drawn up by Sir Nicholas Goodison, former director of the National Art Collection Fund, which shows how moving to a US-style system - where tax relief is given to private donors - would not only keep these collections in the UK, it would ensure that the public had access to them long before they developed into a national crisis. It would also change the whole culture of patronage in this country.

Mr Brown should stop seeing this much-needed reform as a way of helping the rich avoid taxes; he should see it as a way of reinventing the age of that greatest of all donors, Andrew Carnegie.

©Magnus Linklater


This article: http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/review.cfm?id=1104332006

Finis