Search | Site Info | Site Map

MENU

HOMEPAGE

Animal Health/
Welfare/Zoonoses

Environment

Land Reform

Social/
Economic/
Political

Food

Science

Fishing

Tourism

Education

Cultybraggan
Farm

Trade

Book Reviews

Light Relief

Links

Glossary

Correspondence

Vacancies

Contact Us

Get Acrobat Reader

 

 

Back to SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL Homepage

The Tommy Sheridan case reflects badly on all sides - whatever the outcome

Editorial

Filed 03 Aug 06
©www.land-care.org.uk

For the past four weeks the populace has been treated to daily accounts of the long running case at the Court of Session in Edinburgh, brought by Tommy Sheridan MSP. He is suing the News of the World for £200,000 for defamation.

He claims that his reputation, both as a man and as a career politician, has been severely damaged by the publication of his alleged extramarital activities whilst he was claiming to the electorate that he cherished family values. He resented the charge that he was a hypocrite.

While many of the multitude may have enjoyed mild titillation from the public exposure of the alleged libidinous behaviour of this macho charismatic figure, the whole affair has a sick ring to it.

Tommy Sheridan was the one-time leader of the political party known as the Scottish Socialist Party which currently has six seats in the devolved Scottish Parliament at Holyrood. The case opens up a can of worms as to how this political party apparently operates. The impression given is of a political party that is seriously disfunctional with a degree of infighting that might do credit to a bunch of street rats.

As far as the public is concerned, goodness knows who is committing perjury in court or who is just 'mistaken in their recollection of events'. Irrespective of who wins the case the image of what has been described as the 'Scottish Sex Party' is in tatters. Or is it that the 'celebrity' status of the character in the title role in this pathetic saga will be greatly enhanced, whatever the outcome.

The modern fashion is to extol so-called celebrities giving them credibility in areas where it does not exist, and where 'celebrity' status can be achieved by bad-boy behaviour rather than by any valid contribution to society. Probably most people don't care too much whether Tommy Sheridan did or did not frolic with how many consenting adults in some sex dive be it in Machester of the middle of Glasgow, but they do - or should - care about how a political party operates that claims to represent the very real needs of a section of the electorate.

The impression given is of a party where the more serious form of corruption is in the behaviour of its party MSPs, officials and certain supporters amongst and against themselves.

There can be little wonder that the electorate has such a poor opinion of politicians. With devolution, Scottish politicians have had a unique opportunity to get above the rabble that characterises Westminster. They recently got their own parliament. but the fancy building was poorly constructed at vast public expense, largely due to political and executive mismanagement.

What also comes to mind is the jailing of Scottish labour peer Lord Watson. Why on earth did he get a peerage in the first place? In the absence of any apparent outstanding public service, failure to keep his seat at the previous general election hardly provides justificaiton. He deliberately set fire to the curtains of a prestigious Edinburgh hotel following a Scottish Politician of the Year Awards bash when people were asleep in the upper floors. He was the promoter of the poorly conceived anti-hunting bill, seemingly based on an ego trip rather than any knowledge of what was involved or its implications (1).

Many folk would not be sorry if, in relation to the present case, the News of the World was done for damages and all the massive legal costs on account of their style of journalism.

There is little hope that national TV in Scotland might take a more responsible stance when reporting Scottish politics. When might they pay rather less attention to featuring charismatic characters of minority parties rather than focussing on the issues?

In summary, this High Court case might best be concluded by his Lordship handing down 'a plague on all the houses' of the participants. But matters of principle are rarely what High Courts bother too much about, but rather on points of law. To that extent the case is of little interest, other than to titillate. The News of the World will sell more copy, so it probably does not matter too much to its proprietors what their come-uppance might be.

The real loser will be the political system. The general election for the next Scottish Parliament takes place in May next year, in just nine months time. Through despair and increasing lack of trust in politicians even fewer people may bother to vote.

©www.land-care.org.uk

References

1. Editorial (2005). The architect of the anti-hunting (Scotland) Bill pleads guilty of being a drunken wilful fire-raiser, endangering the lives of others as they slept in a prestigious Edinburgh hotel.
See SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL Homepage, filed 07 Sep 05, www.land-care.org.uk Click Here to View

Finis