Search | Site Info | Site Map

MENU

HOMEPAGE

Animal Health/
Welfare/Zoonoses

Environment

Land Reform

Social/
Economic/
Political

Food

Science

Fishing

Tourism

Education

Cultybraggan
Farm

Trade

Book Reviews

Light Relief

Links

Glossary

Correspondence

Vacancies

Contact Us

Get Acrobat Reader

 

 

Back to SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL Homepage

SEERAD reneges on terms of environmental scheme

Editorial

Filed 31st May 05
©www.land-care.org.uk

"Question: when is a five-year contract legally enforceable? Answer: when it is signed by a farmer. Question: when is a five-year contract not legally enforceable? Answer: when it is signed by the Scottish Executive", thundered the leader in the Scottish Farmer, 21st May 2005.

This was the reaction to the swinging changes to the payments available through agri-environment schemes which farmers have already signed up to. These changes were announced by the Scottish Environment and Rural Affairs Department (SEERAD) without any consultation.

The Courier newspaper reported that Ross Finnie, the Minister responsible, was furious with his officials, but presumably he had signed off the papers before the announcement was made.

The matter raises serious issues.

Such an action undermines confidence in the integrity of the Scottish Executive and whether or not it is its intention to deal fairly with those over whom it exerts so much control. Or do the Scottish Executive officials simply intend to force their policies in a ham-fisted and dictatorial manner upon those who work on the land.

It creates a sense of bitterness when those who inadvertently (or even deliberately) break SEERAD's rules get severely penalised, while there appears to be no material censorship for those in power who break contracts.

Who is it who is running the show? Is it the Scottish Executive officials or is it the Minister?

The consequence must be a marked undermining of confidence in the new schemes that are (or recently were) on offer from SEERAD: the Rural Stewardship Scheme, the Land Management Contracts and the already troubled Organic Aid Conversion Scheme.

The affair exemplifies and fully justifies the concerns previously expressed by others as to who rules rural Scotland and how they do it (1, 2).

©www.land-care.org.uk

References

1. People Too (2004). Who governs rural Scotland. A discussion on the extent to which we are governed by a democratically accountable Scottish Parliament or by the Scottish Executive Civil Service and lobby groups.
See SOCIAL/ENVIRONMENTAL/POLITICAL Homepage, filed 13 Oct 04, www.land-care.org.uk Click Here to View

2. Macleod, Kirsty (2005). Our countryside - we live here.
See SOCIAL/ENVIRONMENTAL/POLITICAL Homepage, filed 01 Mar 05, www.land-care.org.uk Click Here to View

Finis