|
Back to SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL
Homepage
Westminster Election Special
So Charles Kennedy says " Trust the Liberal
Democrats",
but why should we?
Editorial
Filed 02 May 05
©www.land-care.org.uk
The leader of the Liberal Democratic
Party, Charles Kennedy, has been making great play about how his
party can be trusted. Sadly, however, this is far from the case
as witnessed - not in relation to what has happened in Iraq - but
to what has happened in Scotland.
In Scotland the Liberal Democrat/Labour
coalition have been in power in the devolved government at the Scottish
Parliament for the past 6 years. Just reflect on what they promised
through two Scottish elections and what has happened in relation
to rural and other matters in Scotland.
Land Reform
To quote Jim Wallace (Deputy First
Minister, Scottish Parliament, and leader of the Liberal Democrats
in Scotland) when the Land Reform Bill (now Act) was being launched:
"Good landmanagers have nothing to fear from Land Reform"
What a travesty of the truth that
was in terms of the Scottish Outdoor Access Code, that now is an
essential part of Land Reform legislation.
What a travesty of the truth that
was in terms of the Community Right to Buy, that now is an essential
part of Land Reform legislation.
What a travesty of the truth that
was in terms of the Agricultural Holdings (Scotland) Act 2003, that
now is an essential part of the new legislation that controls land
in Scotland. It has seriously disrupted the arrangements for farm
tenancies, with farms virtually disappearing from the tenancy market.
Promising consultation and then ignoring it
Although there are many examples,
one of the clearest is the way that the Land Reform consultation
exercise was conducted. Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) - an agency
of the Scottish Executive Environment and Rural Affairs Department
(SEERAD) - acted as proposer, consultation organiser and judge and
jury with regard to the responses - most of which they clearly ignored
(1, 2).
The Land Management Contracts that
were published so very late with regard to this year's applications
for Single Farm Payment (central to the reformed Common Agricultural
Policy) are little short of absurd in terms of fostering a "sustainable
and thriving Scottish farming industry" (3,
4).
Look at the serious damage done to
farming in Scotland on account of the Liberal Democrat/Labour coalition
being obsessed with "the environment", whilst they damage
the livelihoods of those who do most of the work looking after it
- the farmers and landowners.
The Minister in charge of SEERAD
is a Liberal Democrat, Ross Finnie. Read what he said at the SAC
Outlook Conference "Benefiting from change" and try and
reconcile that with the current situation in Scottish farming -
which is little short of chaos.
Anti-Hunting (Scotland) Act
It was the Liberal Democrat/Labour
coalition that introduced the anti-hunting bill (now Act) in Scotland,
supposedly leading the world but along the wrong route. It took
up so much valuable time in the Scottish Parliament when the Parliament
should have been devoting its attentions to much more serious matters
that affect the people of Scotland - such as its health service
which had declined from being one of the best to a doubtful also-ran
category. What about crime? And what have they done to our famous
Scottish universities? Remember they have had 6 years in power so
they cannot keep trying to blame matters on others.
What has happened to the Arts in Scotland
Sean Connery recently pointed out,
when he could not get funding to promote Scottish photography, that
there have been no less than 6 Ministers of Culture in the past
6 years. Others have pointed to the threatened demise of the internationally
famous Scottish opera, and whether Pitlochry's famous Theatre in
the Hills will be supported (5). All this
under a Liberal Democrat/Labour Coalition that tells us that the
Scottish economy is good, but is in serious difficulties.
The Economy
Look how the Liberal Democrat/Labour
Coalition in Scotland has let the Scottish economy lag seriously
behind that of the rest of the UK. According to the economic experts,
Scotland's public sector now consumes around 54% of our gross domestic
product. That compares with a figure for the UK as a whole of around
43%. Virtually all the experts agree that a public sector so large
can only have a drag effect on economic growth (6)
According to a Parliamentary Answer
obtained March 2005, since 1997 there have been 29 new quangos established
in Scotland. The growth of the quango culture is having a stultifying
effect on economic development. The Liberal Democrat/Labour coalition
promised a bonfire of quangos.
The population of Scotland is in
decline, and Scotland is the only part of the UK for which this
is true.
According to the Global Entrepreneurship
Monitor the proportion of Scots expected to start a business in
the next three years in 2004 was 6.6% against a figure for the UK
as a whole of 9.5% - an extremely wide and worrying gap.
The Liberal Democrats want to put
up taxes for those who are financially successful, rather than concentrating
on cutting out massive government waste.
Sir David Steele, Liberal Democrat,
was Presiding Officer when the new Scottish Parliament building
was being constructed. The costs were allowed to run out of control
on a monstrous scale through poor supervision - and, of course,
quite contrary to what had been promised.
With the Liberal Democrat/Labour
Coalition in power over the past 6 years, Scotland has lost most
of its fishing industry and is heading to loose most of its quality
livestock industry. Yet they have consistently claimed that they
want to see a thriving "sustainable" fishing and farming
industries. They say one thing and the result is another.
We surely know that the Labour Party
is not to be trusted (be it under Blair or Brown), but we also surely
know - from their performance in Scotland - that neither is the
Liberal Democrat Party. So why should we believe that the Liberal
Democrats south of the border would behave any better?
So what is happening about the EC?
During the current election campaign
there is a strange quietness about the European Commission, where
all these directives come from. Clearly it is very important to
know how the different parties stand with regard to the ever greater
influence of the EC and our country's subservience to it. Yet hardly
a word in this election campaign as to who is going to represent
us in Westminster. But in Scotland the Liberal Democrats, along
with their Labour colleagues, appear to be rather too pro EC - probably
for their own personal good, rather than that of the voters. At
least the Tories have made noises that they would support coming
out of the EC Common Fisheries Policy that has caused so much damage
to the Scottish fishing fleet (7). They
have also clearly signalled "no" to the proposed European
Constitution`
Who is to be trusted?
Perhaps the letter writer to the
Scottish Farmer this week is correct (8).
In his view, the Conservative Party is the only major party that
has learnt the painful lesson of EU membership - and hopefully other
lessons too - and just might be the best bet.
But trust is a scarce commodity among
the political parties at the present time. Provided they have learnt
from their past mistakes, the conservatives might just have a bit
more of it than the others. At least that is the way it appears
to be in the eyes of this reviewer in Scotland.
©www.land-care.org.uk
References
1. Irvine, James
(2003). Does SNH conduct itself as an honest broker, or as a political
manipulator?
See SCOTTISH OU|TDOOR ACCESS CODE Homepage, filed 25 Oct
03, www.land-care.org.uk Click
Here to View
2. Editorial (2003).
Redrafted SNH Scottish Outdoor Access Code pays little heid to consultation
responses.
See SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL Homepage, filed 02 Dec 03,
www.land-care.org.uk Click
Here to View
3. Editorial (2005).
"Increased flexibility for farmers" announces the Scottish
Executive: but far too late for 2005 summer grazings.
See SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL Homepage, filed 11 Apr 05,
www.land-care.org.uk Click
Here to View
4. Irvine, James
(2005). Land Management Contracts analyzed: item 10 - biodiversity
cropping on inbye. Surely the stupidest of them all.
See SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL Homepage, filed 14 Mar 05,
www.land-care.org.uk Click
Here to View
5. Linklater, Magnus
(2005). Linklater's Scotland - Pitlochry theatre. Scotland on Sunday
10th April. Reproduced on land-Care by permission
See SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL Homepage, filed 15 Apr 05,
www.land-care.org.uk Click
Here to View
6. Fraser, Murdo
(2005). "Towards a modern rural economy: enterprise or regulation"
Part 5: Session 4a. Scottish Countryside Alliance Conference "Getting
the balance right : rural Scotland 2005". 12th April, Edinburgh
See SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL Homepage, filed 02 May 05,
www.land-care.org.uk Click
Here to View
7. Stevenson, Struan
(2003). Fishing for a future.
See FISHING Homepage, filed 09 Jan 03, www.land-care.org.uk
Click
Here to View
8. Zawadski, Christopher
(2005). Choosing the right party. Scottish Farmer, April 30, p7
|