Search | Site Info | Site Map

MENU

HOMEPAGE

Animal Health/
Welfare/Zoonoses

Environment

Land Reform

Social/
Economic/
Political

Food

Science

Fishing

Tourism

Education

Cultybraggan
Farm

Trade

Book Reviews

Light Relief

Links

Glossary

Correspondence

Vacancies

Contact Us

Get Acrobat Reader

 

 

Back to Social/Economic/Political Homepage

23 May 2003

Estimated Contribution of the Red Meat Sector to the Scottish Economy

(Filed 23 May 2003)
www.land-care.org.uk

Quality Meat Scotland (QMS) commissioned Professor Chris Doyle to prepare an independent report on the contribution the red meat sector makes to the Scottish Economy (1).

The report has been completed and is available on the QMS website HERE (Microsoft Word format) through linkage with the QMS website (www.sqbla.org.uk).

For the convenience of readers of Land-Care the concluding observations are reproduced below verbatim, together with Figure 4 of the report.

Concluding Observations

The contribution of the Red Meat Sector in Scotland to Income and Employment is summarised in Figure 4. From this it can be seen that:

  • Fairly directly it is estimated to contribute £1,400M to £1,600M to the Gross Value Added (GVA).
  • Indirectly through its links with suppliers and other parts of the economy, it’s contribution to GVA may be nearer £3,450M to £3,650M.
  • In employment terms, around 30,000 jobs directly depend on it in Scotland and indirectly up to 40,000 people may gain their livelihoods through it.

Clearly, without any satisfactory means of validation, the estimates are surrounded with considerable caveats.

Figure 4

Click here to enlarge image

 

There are those who, in pursuit of their political agendas or opportunities for funding, decry the economic contribution that the red meat sector makes to the Scottish economy. Such persons would prefer that Scottish agricultural production be turned off in most of the country in favour of environmental and recreation programmes (2).

“Consumers are replacing producers as the dominant social group”

Dr Dick Birnie, MLURI

Professor Doyle’s report shows that in fact the red meat sector does make an important positive contribution to the Scottish economy. Not only that but the livestock industry in Scotland is one of the Nation’s flagships in terms of producing a quality product. In terms of beef production Scotland is a leader within Europe not only in quality but also in quantity (3).

Furthermore, the livestock industry in Scotland is responsible for much of the care and character of Scotland’s landscape on account of its farmers.

Land-Care totally dismisses the following statement by Dr Bob Aitken, Scottish Countryside Activities Council (2) as arrogant self-seeking nonsense

“...there are better ways of maintaining the landscape than subsidising farmers to do it. Over a lot of Scotland, if farming stopped, it would matter a lot less than we imagine”

Dr Bob Aitken, SCAC

Land-Care deprecates the attempts of certain academics and others who wish to take control of much of Scotland’s land to convert it into a playground (e.g. SCAC), or exert excessive control over what they (e.g. SNH) consider to be the important environmental issues (4). The reality is that the organisations who advocate such excesses have little knowledge, experience or competence regarding land management. Nor do they acknowledge that the high standard of Scotland’s landscape, much admired throughout the world, has been in substantial part achieved by the dedication of generations of farmers.

www.land-care.org.uk

 

References

1. Estimated Contribution of the Red Meat Sector to the Scottish Economy. Report Prepared by Professor Chris Doyle of Larch Research Ltd for Quality Meat Scotland. Version 2, May 2003.
(Download in Microsoft Word format).

2. Irvine, James (2003). The Arrogance of Academics pontificating about Rural Affairs. Are they letting us down?
(Filed 14 May 2003, www.land-care.org.uk, click here to view).

3. Walker, Jim (2003). Impact of mid-term review on beef: decline would be significant. Scottish Farmer, 10 May 2003, p. 21. (Relevant graphs can be found in Reference 2).

4. PEOPLE TOO response to Amendments to the Conservation Regulations.
(Filed 8 May 2003, www.land-care.org.uk, click here to view).