Search | Site Info | Site Map

MENU

HOMEPAGE

Animal Health/
Welfare/Zoonoses

Environment

Land Reform

Social/
Economic/
Political

Food

Science

Fishing

Tourism

Education

Cultybraggan
Farm

Trade

Book Reviews

Light Relief

Links

Glossary

Correspondence

Vacancies

Contact Us

Get Acrobat Reader

 

 

Back to SCIENCE Homepage

Barley research at SCRI receives massive boost

Editorial

Filed 30 May 05
©www.land-care.org.uk

The barley programme at the Scottish Crop Research Institute (SCRI), led by Dr Robbie Waugh, has just won four competitive research contracts worth over £3 million to extend their work on the underlying genetic mechanisms that control yield, quality and environmental sustainability of the crop. This funding will enable the team to employ five additional scientists for the next 4 years.

Two separate grants awarded jointly by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) and the Scottish Executive Environment and Rural Affairs Department (SEERAD) (£404,000 and £500,000) will allow the SCRI team to address specific areas of barley genetics which will increase knowledge about how barley genes work and contribute further to the understanding of the growth and functioning of barley plants.

An award of Euro 450,000 (c. £300,000) from the EU Framework 6 program will look at the genetic processes underlying disease resistance. This is part of a Euro 15M Integrated project called BioExploit.

Most Scottish barley is used in the manufacture of beer and whisky. Whisky is consistently the UK's largest export in the food and drink sector, earning over £2.2 billion in 2004 and employing over 13,000 people in Scotland, mainly in rural communities. About 30% of the arable land area of Scotland currently grows barley.

Improving economically important characteristics of barley such as yield, resistance to pests and diseases (which dictates how much the crop will need to be sprayed to protect it) and the amount of alcohol that can be extracted from it during the process of making 'malt' whisky are key targets of commercial barley breeders. Barley breeding routinely involves making a cross between two different parent cultivars to generate a very large number of daughter lines. During this process, the DNA of the parental lines is shuffled to generate an almost infinite number of combinations, only one of which is represented in each daughter line. The breeders challenge is to identify a daughter line that is better than the parents for one or more of the selected characters. Like us, the genetic characteristics of individual barley cultivars is determined by the specific combinations of genes that it contains. However, as the barley DNA probably contains over 40,000 genes it is difficult to identify which combinations are important for the crop's environmental, grower and industry acceptance.

The £3M research funding will allow the SCRI Barley Research Group to look for the genes that control the characters that are important for improving barley production and use. While this will be a stiff challenge, this project brings experimental and analytical tools used in human and plant genetic studies to identify and understand how natural gene variants influence desirable plant characters. It will take advantage of local expertise in statistics, and extensive plant materials and datasets available through UK national plant evaluation trials.

Dr Waugh argues that once they have derived a good understanding of what combinations of genes are required to make a good barley variety, breeders will be able to look for even better ones, tailored to meet both the industries' exact requirements and improve the impact that growing the crop has on the environment.

Last year at least 90% of the barley used in Scotch Whisky was from Scottish growers, although the percentage in previous years was lower, much to the concern of Scottish arable farmers. Improvement of varieties could potentially fill the gap, promote the industry and invigorate the economy in rural areas of Scotland. Unfortunately, other forces are acting counter to such a commendable achievement.

In recent years growing barley for malting - or indeed to sell as feed for livestock - has not been a profitable business - even before the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) lead to decoupling of farm subsidies from production in the UK. While the whiskey industry is indeed one of the premier industries for Scotland, the price that farmers receive for the high quality product does not meet the cost of production. It is likely that 2005 and onwards may see a a significant reduction in the amount of malting - and indeed of feed - barley grown in Scotland.

It is understood that the malsters in Scotland are under considerable pressure with the recent closure of a number of plants. The farmers have long warned the whisky industry that it will no longer be able to source sufficient malting barley from Scotland to meet their needs, unless the price paid to farmers allows growing it to be a profitable enterprise. To date the whisky industry has avoided pressure that asks it to specify the country of origin of the barley used in its production, thereby allowing them to buy cheaper from abroad whenever they fancy. It would not be unreasonable to expect bottle of Scotch to carry a label stating that the materials involved in its production come from Scotland, but sadly this is not generally the case.

So we have an example of the extraordinary chaos that currently exists in Scottish farming, and indeed in UK farming generally. Thus in Scotland we have:

  • a world renowned industry - Scotch whisky - that makes masses of revenue for the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer due to the extortionate taxes imposed on its sale,

  • huge grants from the EU and UK research councils to improve the barley crop

  • the price paid to farmers for this high quality product does not meet the cost of production

It would therefore seem inevitable that the amount of barley grown in Scotland will decline.

Is it not time that the politicians took more interest in the economics of farming in Scotland, rather than concentrating so much on the more romantic and populist subjects of "the environment" with its "biodiversity" and "conservation"? If they do not, then the research that has been so well funded at SCRI will benefit other countries in preference to our own, and the name "Scotch" will be even less plausible than it is at the moment.

©www.land-care.org.uk

Finis