Search | Site Info | Site Map

MENU

HOMEPAGE

Animal Health/
Welfare/Zoonoses

Environment

Land Reform

Social/
Economic/
Political

Food

Science

Fishing

Tourism

Education

Cultybraggan
Farm

Trade

Book Reviews

Light Relief

Links

Glossary

Correspondence

Vacancies

Contact Us

Get Acrobat Reader

 

 

Back to SCIENCE Homepage

Profile of a Cultybraggan Limousin Cow

James Irvine

Director,Teviot Scientific at Cultybraggan Farm, Comrie, Perthshire

Filed 12 May 04
© land-care.org.uk

Cultybraggan Farm runs a suckler herd of cattle amounting to over 110 cows plus their followers: in-calf and bulling heifers, bullocks and young calves. It has been a closed herd for over 4 years, meaning that no replacements have been bought in over that time, greatly reducing the risks of importing disease. This necessitates keeping a range of bulls to avoid the problems of inbreeding.

Broadly the herd consists of 25% pedigree Aberdeen Angus cows, 25% pedigree Limousin cows and 50% as crosses between Aberdeen Angus and Limousin and vice versa.

In building up this herd over the past 15 years care has been taken to breed cows with good milk production and easy calving, high health status, strong maternal instincts and placid temperament. The aim has been to also select for good confirmation but not at the expense of excessive beefiness, which increases the risks of poor milk production and calving difficulties. Having been an initial ardent follower of Meat and Livestock Commission/Signet Estimated Beef Values (EBV's) this lead to disillusionment as the usefulness of such figures for breeding herd replacements is highly questionable if not frankly misleading.

Also important is the selection of bulls to be used in creating such the closed suckler herd. Bulls in such circumstances should fall into two categories. Those whose purpose is to help breed good female replacements, and those whose purpose is to produce beef (terminal sires in sheep speak). These are two quite different functions, but when at any pedigree bull sale that I know of has a bull been given a ticket for being a good producer of suckler cows?

The cow featured in figs 1-3 has bloodlines over at least two generations that are known by pedigree breeders to be associated with good milk production. My impression is that there are remarkably few of such bloodlines about. Sadly, in my view, little if any confidence can be put on Sigent/MLC EBV scoring for milk production or ease of calving.

 

Figure 1: A good pedigree Limousin cow:
excellent milk production, good enough confirmation, placid temperament and a history of easy calving.

 

Figure 2: The new-born calf is not too big, gets up quick and knows where to go
with the encouragement of its mother who gives it a good licking

(For an enlarged view Click Here)

Figure 3: Doing nicely. The cow needs good nutrition to maintain the milk supply and access to a source of high magnesium to avoid the condition known as "staggers" especially if put onto good spring grass.

This article features a pedigree Limousin cow. Such a cow is highly relevant as the most widely used terminal sire in the UK is a Limousin bull on account of its reputation as having good confirmation. But quality meat in the commercial market is not just based on quantity but on eating quality, which in the UK is notoriously variable.

The Aberdeen Angus breed has long had the reputation for good eating quality, but this reputation has been tarnished in the UK by such enterprises as Aberdeen Angus Steak Houses, where it is alleged that the amount of Aberdeen Angus breeding in the product was variable. Also the labelling of meat in the supermarkets still does not define just how much Aberdeen Angus is in a so called Aberdeen Angus steak, nor what else is in it. The shopper is encouraged to think of Tesco, Sainsbury, Marks and Spencers as being brands of beef - quite remote from whatever the breeding might have been.

In the background of the above figures black cows are to be seen. These are not black Limousins - a highly unfortunate development by a small but influential minority within the British Limousin Cattle Society and which that society is fighting hard - although belatedly - to have such cattle excluded as British registerable pedigree Limousins. Rather it would be better to breed cattle with a clearly defined AA and Limousin genetics with the aim of keeping as much as possible of the eating quality of Aberdeen Angus and improving the conformation of the Aberdeen Angus by introducing a known amount of Limousin genetics.

This might lead to a new breed. Indeed certain breeders in Ireland are trying to do just that but unfortunately in the eyes of many were too devious in their marketing with the use of the name Aberdeen Angus. If there is to be such a new breed it should be given a name that contains neither the words Aberdeen Angus or Limousin - it should be a called something entirely different.

At last the Aberdeen Cattle Society has adopted the Australian devised scoring system for cattle called Breedplan. |nstead of denying the possible importance of marbling in muscle (intramuscular fat) the Australian programme encourages its measurement. Breeders of cattle should then be better placed in trying to breed cattle so as to provide beef that the different types of consumer want for different occasions. It should also enable some much needed and relevant objectivity into beef production in terms of eating quality. The Australians and the Americans have done it: it is about time we in the UK and especially in Scotland cottoned on.

On starting a new herd the most important thing to do is to get the foundation cow/s right.

© www.land-care.org.uk