Search | Site Info | Site Map

MENU

HOMEPAGE

Animal Health/
Welfare/Zoonoses

Environment

Land Reform

Social/
Economic/
Political

Food

Science

Fishing

Tourism

Education

Cultybraggan
Farm

Trade

Book Reviews

Light Relief

Links

Glossary

Correspondence

Vacancies

Contact Us

Get Acrobat Reader

 

 

Back to Land Reform Homepage

23 December 2002

No Corners Cut on Land Reform Bill

Letter from Pauline McNeill
MSP and Convenor of the Justice 2 Committee

Scotland on Sunday, Letters, 15 December 2002

THE members of the Scottish Parliament's Justice 2 Committee are perturbed by the way in which the article pieced together by Magnus Linklater (Land reform falls foul of Scotland's own kangaroo committee, December 1) took quotes out of context and crafted our report to make it look as if it was less than thorough.

This has undoubtedly been the most difficult piece of legislation to date that we as a committee have been asked to scrutinise. This is mainly because of the size of the bill and the nature of legislating in this area. Magnus Linklater accuses the committee of not delivering justice to the Land Reform Bill. The truth is, I suspect, that Magnus does not really agree that the parliament should give a meaningful statutory right of access the countryside, otherwise he would have supported the committee's findings which were delivered after eight weeks of evidence plus the longest stage two procedure of the Scottish Parliament to date.

Incidentally, the Rights of Way Society were represented by Bruce Logan when he gave oral evidence as part of the Scottish Countryside Network and their written evidence has been considered carefully.

As for the committee's rejection of the advice given to us by the rural affairs committee of the Law Society, there is in fact a lack of case law relating to open land as opposed to building or curtilage. Cases which we were presented with show those tended to involve other criminal offences.

There is, of course, no statute on trespass apart from the 1865 Trespass Scotland Act, which concerns camping without permission and the lighting of fires. The SNH advice is probably the best policy, which is that we should focus on the law we are trying to create because it is meant to clear up that confusion that clearly does exist.

I am not alone in my belief that we should create the way for more landowners in Scotland; there are too few. This cannot happen unless more land becomes available and much of it will not be for some time to come. The committee has made sensible changes to the right-to-buy provision, ones the Executive have conceded as a result of our Stage One report completed earlier this year.

There will be further changes to this bill at Stage Three.

Pauline McNeill, MSP