|
Back to Current Topic
Brussels to Control the Foot and Mouth Fight
The Telegraph,
12 September 2002
Brussels would take charge of future foot and
mouth epidemics under a new European directive that strips Britain
of the power to decide whether to vaccinate livestock.
Shocked by the emerging allegations of incompetence
by British officials, the European Commission has concluded that
no single member state can be trusted to tackle epidemic diseases
threatening the whole union. The EC would have power to order vaccination.
Countries worried by an outbreak in another EU
state could trigger mandatory vaccination, meaning that Ireland
or France could effectively override Britain's slaughter policy.
The intervention by Brussels ends the reliance
on mass slaughter that saw six million animals burned in Britain
last year. The cull turned much of the countryside into a no-go
area, led to a public outcry across Europe and was denounced as
"immoral" by the Dutch farm minister.
The draft law moves the European Union towards
a policy of emergency vaccination, implicitly rebutting claims by
the Government that vaccines are not viable because of the multiple
strains of the disease.
The commission will be able to order vaccination
if infected livestock are not culled within 24 hours and contiguous
animals within 48 hours. In Britain it took as long as seven days
to carry out culls in the early phase, before the Army was brought
in.
The directive is to be published in early October.
The draft version obtained by The Telegraph says: "The decision
to introduce vaccination shall be taken by the commission on request
of the member states directly affected, or on request of the member
states under risk, or on the commission's own initiative."
Brussels is to stockpile a million doses of the
vaccine for immediate use and a further four million to be ready
within 10 days.
In an implicit reproach to Britain, the commission
will police member states to ensure that their contingency plans
are up to scratch. Specific requirements are set down for the number
of vets and surveillance personnel and biannual field drills along
the lines of recent exercises in Australia.
"It's no longer going to be enough to have
some plan sitting in a drawer at Defra," said one official.
Responsibility for outbreaks will be devolved
to regional centres, breaking the stranglehold of Defra headquarters
at Page Street. Neil Parish, MEP, the Tory farm spokesman, said
the directive was an indictment of Government policy.
"These proposals, if they are true, highlight
obvious errors made by Defra in ignoring pleas for emergency vaccination
and more regional control," he said. "They show that even
the Government's revised contingency plan is woefully inadequate."
The new directive is a response to a year-long
inquiry by the European Parliament, which has highlighted major
shortcomings in British policy.
Euro-MPs were shocked to learn that the British
contingency plan was kept secret in the early days of the epidemic,
leaving farmers in the dark at a crucial moment. By contrast, the
French plan was posted on the internet. EC officials admit privately
that they too failed in their duty to check that Britain's contingency
plans were up to speed, a mistake they are determined not to repeat.
Jan Mulder, a Dutch liberal MEP leading the inquiry,
said he had some sympathy for Britain given the unexpected strain
of the disease and the way it spread silently through sheep without
exhibiting symptoms. "It's easier to be wise after the event,"
he said. "The catastrophe was on such a scale that it was hard
to see how they could have contained it."
But the hearings had exposed Britain's lack of
control on meat imports as "a recipe for disaster", he
said. The Government made a fatal error in waiting three days before
stopping all animal movements.
The shift away from the slaughter policy has been
made easier by new international rules agreed in May, which make
it less costly for countries to resort to ring vaccination.
These rules limit the loss of foot and mouth free
status from 12 to 6 months and confine the affected area to regions
rather than whole states.
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
|