Search | Site Info | Site Map

MENU

HOMEPAGE

Animal Health/
Welfare/Zoonoses

Environment

Land Reform

Social/
Economic/
Political

Food

Science

Fishing

Tourism

Education

Cultybraggan
Farm

Trade

Book Reviews

Light Relief

Links

Glossary

Correspondence

Vacancies

Contact Us

Get Acrobat Reader

 

 

Back to FMD Homepage

Suspected FMD at Huntly, Aberdeenshire

Dr James Irvine FRSE DSc FRCPath FRCPEd FInstBiol

 

The following is a statement issued by SEERAD on its website:

 

Foot and Mouth tests prove negative
30/11/2002

Initial tests on a case of suspected Foot and Mouth have returned negative results.

Samples had been sent to the laboratory at Pirbright, Surrey, after mouth lesions were found in a seven month old steer on a farm in the Huntly area of Aberdeenshire.

Tests that will produce definitive results will take a further 96 hours and in the meantime movement restrictions around the farm, and all farms in an 8 kilometre (5 mile) radius, will be maintained. There are also restrictions on a farm in Dumfries and Galloway which had contact with the animal.

 

A number of suspected cases of FMD are bound to arise on account of the fact that blisters in the mouth may result from several causes: i.e. there is a differential diagnosis to consider, including simple trauma. Clearly there is also an element of the veterinary authorities making sure that they are not caught out by missing a case. It is important for all concerned that movement restrictions and the fear of FMD be time limited as efficiently as possible.

It sounds somewhat archaic that even at the end of November/beginning of December 2002 the authorities are still working on the old test system whereby it takes 4 days before a diagnosis of FMD can be confidently ruled out. How long will it take for the UK veterinary services to apply modern science and get a definitive yes or no for FMD in a much shorter time? It is easy enough for the Veterinary authorities to bang on restriction of movement orders as they do not suffer the economic consequences and their backs are covered.

No doubt the State Veterinary Service will say they are waiting for “validation” of the “new” diagnostic tests. That has been their excuse now for a very long time although the relevant science has been there for years. It all rather smells of bureaucratic muddle. One has to wonder who is getting round to do this so-called “validation”. It always seems to be someone else’s problem, while the authorities in the UK (and I daresay in Europe generally) carry on in the same old way apparently indefinitely.

 

Related Links on Land-Care

European Temporary Committee on FMD

Irvine, W. J. (2002). Comments on the Draft Report of the EU FMD Inquiry

Irvine, W. J. (2002). Scottish Executive Rejects Royal Society of Edinburgh FMD Inquiry Recommendation

DEFRA's Foot and Mouth Disease Contingency Plan. Land-Care, Contingency Planning reports

20 Day Standstill Rule for Livestock (Editorial)