Search | Site Info | Site Map

MENU

HOMEPAGE

Animal Health/
Welfare/Zoonoses

Environment

Land Reform

Social/
Economic/
Political

Food

Science

Fishing

Tourism

Education

Cultybraggan
Farm

Trade

Book Reviews

Light Relief

Links

Glossary

Correspondence

Vacancies

Contact Us

Get Acrobat Reader

 

 

Back to FMD Homepage

Is Professor Brian Spratt the right person
to head the inquiry into the alleged
biosecurity leak at Pirbright?

James Irvine

Teviot Scientific, Cultybraggan Farm, Comrie, Perthshire

Filed 06 Aug 07
©www.land-care.org.uk

There can be no doubt that Professor Brian Spratt is a highly distinguished scientist, But is he the right person to head up the inquiry into the alleged biosecurity leak at Pirbright? It is alleged that a highly unusual strain of FMD virus, type O1 BSF537, may have escaped from either the Merial vaccine production facility or the IAH laboratories at Pirbright to infect nearby cattle.

According to his CV he is an international leader in the study of the mechanisms whereby bacteria can become resistant to antibiotics. There is little mention of him having expertise in the management of large scale virology laboratories involved in the handling of highly dangerous viruses.

It would seem to me that it would have been much more sensible for a virologist, well versed in the management of an NHS virology laboratory on a daily basis, to have been selected for the task. There is a huge difference in the responsibilities, training and career structure required to run a diagnostic/research laboratory primarily concerned with viruses, compared to that required to run a research laboratory primary concerned with bacteria.

The problem with the Institute of Animal Health at Pribright is that it seems to be required to act both as a research laboratory and as a routine diagnostic laboratory with special responsibilities for handling viruses from around the world.

Also, it is high time that the extensive expertise that is available in the NHS in relation to virology is used to good effect. The longterm prejudice that veterinary virologists may have against interference from their medical colleagues requires to be broken down.

Also, by calling in an NHS virology expert, the worry that the inquiry might be influenced by a chairman who is perhaps beholden for research grants form the Government might well be avoided.

©www.land-care.rog.uk