Search | Site Info | Site Map

MENU

HOMEPAGE

Animal Health/
Welfare/Zoonoses

Environment

Land Reform

Social/
Economic/
Political

Food

Science

Fishing

Tourism

Education

Cultybraggan
Farm

Trade

Book Reviews

Light Relief

Links

Glossary

Correspondence

Vacancies

Contact Us

Get Acrobat Reader

 

 

Back to FMD Homepage

Dismay at statements made by
President of NFU on BBC TV

James Irvine

Teviot Scientific, Cultybraggan Farm, Comrie, Perthshire

Filed 08 Aug
©www.land-care.org.uk

Just two days ago I praised the President of NFU for saying that, in relation to the management of the current FMD crisis in Surrey, his Union would be guided by science. Indeed, I congratulated him on taking the correct stance, while the distinguished figure of Sir Brian Porritt had recently written in the Sunday Times that the management of FMD outbreaks was a social and political matter, with science presumably playing a secondary role (1).

But this morning the President of NFU was back talking about stamping out by culling in the hope of avoiding EU penalties in terms of export bans if vaccination was used. The incuabtion period is anything between 7 up to 14 days. We are no where near out of the woods, so to speak.

This is an intensely dangerous game he is playing. FMD is the most contagious disease that there is that affects hoofed animals. Minute amounts of virus are sufficient to spread it.

Who on earth is advising the NFU about what science can do, if only it were to be applied in this country? We seem to be right back at the dreadful days of UK FMD 2001, when the NFU President of the day was doing so much damage by taking the stance that the current president is reiterating today.

The comments by the current President of the British Veterinary Association (BVA), David Catlow, in the same BBC TV programme this morning were embarassing. Science just does not seem to come into BVA's thinking. Instead, he pooured out bland, profuse compliments on the Institute of Animal Health Laboratory at Pirbright, which in reality seems to have consistently put its mind against accepting scientific advances that others have made in other countries.

I cannot imagine a situation where the earliest possible use of vaccination to prevent transmission of FMD could be more relevant.

©www.land-care.org.uk

Reference

1. Irvine, James (2007). Sir Brian Follett repeats fallacies of UK FMD 2001
See FMD Homepage, filed 06 Aug 07, www.land-care.org.uk Click Here to View

Finis