|
Back to Current Topic
Legislation, Directives and Confusion - Or Is It?
Tricia Henton
Abstract
Nearly 80% of Scotland is farmed. It is therefore
not surprising that agricultural practices have the potential to
exert significant effects, both positive and negative, on the quality
of the Scottish environment. Custodians
of Change (1) states that, "it is regrettable
that regulatory regimes have become dominant drivers of change".
The real driver of change should be the mutual interests of the
environment, and the industry, assisted by legislation and regulation.
Progress comes through proactive effort on partnership/interagency
working, awareness raising and sharing good practice. The complex
plethora of regulations, directives and advice can appear confusing
to those who have to comply. The complexity can be addressed through
understanding the direction in which these instruments are driving
agriculture and recognition of shared interests in the outcomes.
SEPA's role is wider than that of regulator alone.
Potential impacts of agriculture on the environment
SEPA predicts that diffuse agricultural pollution
will be the most significant cause of poor water quality in Scotland
by 2010 (2). Diffuse pollution comprises true non-point
source contamination such as run-off from fields or seepage of nutrients
from soil to groundwater. Diffuse sources are often individually
minor, but collectively significant. SEPA is not normally able to
control diffuse sources by issuing discharge consents, but instead
promotes best practice to minimise pollution.
Other environmental issues related to agricultural
sources include emissions to air, landspreading of livestock slurries
and sewage sludge, use of fertilisers and pesticides and potential
release of sheep dip chemicals to ground and surface waters. In
Scotland the net emission of carbon from land use is 36% of that
from fossil fuels. This compares with 5% for the UK. Excessive nutrients
cause eutrophication of waters
In 2000, there were 379 agricultural pollution
events, 61 of these (16%) classified as a major event.
The breakdown of-sources is given in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Scottish Agricultural Pollution Group
Statistics (2000)
| Number |
Source |
| 17 (4%) |
pig and poultry units |
| 56 (15%) |
slurry stores |
| 20 (5%) |
dungsteads |
| 29 (8%) |
run-off from land |
| 31 (8%) |
oil |
| 31 (8%) |
animal carcass disposal |
Increased recognition of all the impacts of agriculture
on the environment has resulted in a series of regulations and directives
to control them. These have been implemented over a relatively short
time span, although the legislation has been in existence for many
years. Their wide-ranging nature that starts to challenge practices
encouraged in the past and their application to sectors previously
little regulated has given rise to an impression of complexity and
even confusion. Careful consideration shows that there are clear
objectives and standards to be achieved. The methods used to achieve
these objectives range from legislation and regulation to raising
awareness and partnership working.
The role of SEPA
Most responsibility for practical compliance with
environmental legislation lies with SEPA for Scotland and the Environment
Agency, in England and Wales. Scottish Natural Heritage implements
the Birds and Habitats Directives. SEPA provides a one-stop-shop
for environmental protection, considering all facets of the environment
and takes an integrated approach to prevent and control pollution
through regulation, awareness raising and encouraging good practice.
SEPA operates a regulatory framework that is
transparent, accountable, targeted, consistent and proportional
by encouraging the active participation of stakeholders as legislation
is developed. Implementation of the Water Framework Directive has
been a vehicle for fostering a constructive working relationship
between the statutory agencies and the agricultural community.
Legislation
Over 90% of UK's legislation originates in Europe.
Many environmental problems are international in nature such as
global warming, acid rain and ozone, requiring a supranational organisation
to address them effectively. Much EU environmental policy comes
in the form of Directives and member states are bound to achieve
the results specified within them. However, it is left to individual
member states to decide how the particular Directive should be transposed
into national legislation to deliver the results.
The following Directives are of most relevance
to the agricultural industry:
- Water Framework;
- Integrated Pollution Prevention & Control;
- Nitrates;
- Bathing Water.
Other relevant legislation includes the Birds
Directive, Environmental Impact Assessment, Habitats Directive,
Groundwater Regulations, National Emissions Ceilings Directive and
the Wastes Framework Directive.
However, SEPA has long recognised that it cannot
deliver improvements in the quality of Scotland's environment by
regulation alone.
Raising awareness and partnership working
SEPA works closely with SEERAD, not only with
its own sponsor department but also with the agriculture department.
SEPA made detailed contributions to the Forward Strategy for Agriculture
(3) and the Implementation Group. Relationships
have also been strengthened with the industry as a whole, its accreditation
bodies and research institutions.
SEPA enforces a wide range of environmental legislation
and therefore has the opportunity to integrate its advice and guidance.
For example, SEPA is a leading contributor to the Scottish Executive's
review of the Code for the Prevention of Environmental Pollution
From Agricultural Activity (PEPFAA code).
SEPA is also actively trying to develop the concept
of smarter regulation, in which better use is made of
resources by closer alignment of the priorities and key messages
promulgated by the relevant agencies. In particular, SEPA is discussing
with the Scottish Executive how closer working relationships can
be developed on farm inspection work at a local level. Scottish
Executive agricultural staff visit approx 16,000 farms per annum,
compared to less than 500 by SEPA in recent years. Improved cross-compliance
and assessment of "good farming practice" will rely on
organisations such as SEPA, the Scottish Executive, LEAF, FWAG and
SAC working more closely in the future and this is recognised in
the Agriculture and Environment Working Group report.
SEPA, the Scottish Executive, the NFU Scotland,
SAC, WWF and Scottish Natural Heritage are also all working together
on a Four Point Plan, to be launched later this year,
to promote the adoption of no or low-cost changes in livestock practice.
This initiative is expected to deliver environmental and financial
benefits and assist with driving forward compliance with environmental
legislation on both a farm and catchment scale, particularly in
areas draining to identified Bathing Waters. It is hoped that this
voluntary approach will minimise the risk of pollution and possibly
avoid the need for formal regulation.
Promotion of good practice
SEPA is undertaking specific research into the
practical options available to farmers to address diffuse agricultural
pollution and to improve biodiversity and farmland habitats. The
steering group for this project includes representatives from the
Scottish Executive and NFU Scotland as well as SEPA. One of the
outputs from this study is to explore options to include in agri-environment
schemes, which will be of particular interest in the development
of Land Management Contracts.
SEPA has also instigated a series of farm visits,
in cooperation with the industry, during which potential sources
of pollution are identified and advice given. This has proved popular
with the industry and is helpful in identifying many small sources
of diffuse pollution which collectively can cause problems. We see
initiatives such as LEAF and the promotion of Integrated Farm Management
as central to encouraging change in the industry. The proactive
approach LEAF has adopted in awareness raising and sharing of best
practice is an excellent model to build on in achieving progress.
Conclusion
The substantial volume of environmental policies
and directives that emerge from Europe today could be accused of
causing confusion. SEPA's job is to make sense of it all and convey
that clarity to those whom it regulates.
Land management contracts, sharing good practice,
better communication and partnership/interagency working provide
SEPA and its partners with an opportunity to do things better.
It is the responsibility of any industry to manage
its activities in an informed and environmentally sensitive way.
SEPA is here to help industry to do that.
References
1. Custodians of Change Report
of Agriculture and Environment Working Group, Scottish Executive,
2002
2. SEPA State of the Environment
Report for Water, June 1999
3. A Forward Strategy for Scottish
Agriculture, Scottish Executive, 2001
Tricia Henton is Chief Executive, Scottish Environment Protection
Agency. A geologist by training, Tricia Henton was previously
involved with Scottish river purification boards and private sector
environmental management consultancies. Former president, Chartered
Institution of Water and Environmental Management; former member,
Natural Environment Research Council; former member Water Panel,
Competition Commission.
|