|
Dear Sir,
BAT ADVICE FROM SNH - LETTERS 5/12/02
There is a huge inconsistency at the heart
of DEFRA/SEERAD policy on public safety if you compare how
we are forced to eliminate risk from food consumption and
how we are forced to tolerate risks associated with wildlife,
if Prof Galbraith of SNH's letter is anything to go by.
Confirming that rabies in bats is widespread
in Europe and that 2 cases have been confirmed in England,
his simple conclusion is that risks to the public are "minuscule"
and his advice is "do not touch bats".
An equivalent policy on consumption of farm
products would read something like: the risk of contracting
vCJD from meat is theoretical and minuscule, a much smaller
risk to your health than smoking cigarettes and drinking alcohol.
We would all choose whether we wanted to risk eating meat
or strolling about after dark when bats are active or entering
caves or lofts where we might disturb them through the day.
But this doesn't happen. DEFRA has already
spoken of the possibility of destroying Britain's (not just
England's) national flock of 35m sheep to ensure absolute
public safety from sheep meat. To maintain consumer confidence
in beef, farmers are buried under mountains of documents,
passports and records to eliminate "minuscule" risk.
But rabid bats are to be left in peace.
I hope they heard Professor Galbraith's advice and that they
cooperate by leaving humans alone.
Yours sincerely,
Mrs Kirsty Macleod
|