Search | Site Info | Site Map

MENU

HOMEPAGE

Animal Health/
Welfare/Zoonoses

Environment

Land Reform

Social/
Economic/
Political

Food

Science

Fishing

Tourism

Education

Cultybraggan
Farm

Trade

Book Reviews

Light Relief

Links

Glossary

Correspondence

Vacancies

Contact Us

Get Acrobat Reader

 

 

Back to ENVIRONMENT Homepage

Sound of Arisaig as a mSAC: new details of
SNH advice about regulation.

What is its relevance to the proposed
Marine and Coastal National Park in the area?

James Irvine

Teviot Scientific, Edinburgh & Perthshire

Filed 01 May 06
©www.land-care.org.uk

The Sound of Arisaig (Loch Ailort to Loch Ceann Traigh) was designated by Scottish Ministers as a Special Area of Conservation (SAC) on 17th March 2005.

According to Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH):

"this site is also referred to as a 'European site' (Regulation 10(1)). A 'European marine site' is a 'European site' which is wholly or in part marine (Regulation 2(1)) and is hereafter referred to as a marine SAC"

On 30th March 2006 SNH published its advice to the relevant authorities as to how the Sound of Arisaig mSAC should be managed (1). SNH also stated that this advice can also be used by other competent authorities when assessing plans or projects.

The advice is certainly highly proscriptive. To read in full Click Here

There can be small wonder that those who live and work in the Arisaig area and beyond are very concerned that the Scottish Executive, presumably on the advice of SNH, way choose to create a Coastal & Marine National Park in their area (2, 3).

In June 2005, the Scottish Executive announced their intention to create Scotland's first coastal & marine National Park in 2008. Indeed, SNH states that the Scottish Executive is committed to do so. It is claimed that this follows the Government's consideration of the responses received from the consultation on 'Strategic Frame for Scotland's Marine Environment' in 2004.

SNH was requested by the Scottish Executive to provide advice on

aims, powers and governance structure which would be appropriate for a National Park Authority and its likely running costs

area or areas Ministers should consider as leading candidates for designation

SNH states on its website that

"following extensive stakeholder engagement and debate, this advice has now been finalised and on 31st March 2006 was submitted to Scottish Ministers".

But who did SNH choose to consult among the extensive list of alleged stakeholders? It would appear that those who live and work in the proposed areas were not due to be consulted until their area had been chosen by Ministers.

This incredible situation was in fact confirmed by Ian Jardine, Chief Executive SNH at the recent Scottish Countryside Alliance (SCA) conference at the MacRobert Centre, Royal Highland Show Ground, Ingliston, Edinburgh, "Who runs rural Scotland?" Following a barrage of criticism from other speakers, and in a preview of the conference published in The Scottish Farmer, he admitted a list of SNH self-criticisms. But he was challenged that he had missed out a confession for being "disingenuous".

Reminded that SNH had failed to show up at a meeting of 100 angry persons at Mallaig Community Centre entitled

"Are you concerned at the prospects of living in a coast national park?"

he stated that SNH was not required to consult locally until after the choice of site had been decided. In other words, the views of the local residents did not matter in choosing the site, but only when the choice was a fait accompli. And then, presumably, the situation would be explained to them lest they might be confused. Me thinks that is indeed disingenuous, as well as demeaning and patronising.

The local Community Council is holding a public meeting on May 4th in Arisaig at 7.30pm to discuss the matter. It is understood that the usual SNH device to break up those present into small groups has been refused, and that after a presentation by SNH, John Hermse of the NW & Mallaig Fishermen's Association and Kirsty Macleod, founder director of the People TOO organisation, will address those present.

It should be an interesting meeting.

But there must be serious concern about the tactics of SNH and its relationship with the Scottish Executive. Ian Jardine was pressed further during informal discussion at the SCA cnference mentioned above. It was put to him that consultations carried out by SNH were largely a sham, and that SNH pressed ahead regardless with its main objectives whatever the responses it received. This was evidenced by its handling of the consultations which ended up as the Land Reform (Scotland) Act (5). He stated that

"the job of SNH is to fulfill the Government's wishes".

In other words, the assessment of the responses to SNH consultations are conveniently adjusted by SNH to fit what the government wishes.

No small wonder there is a lack of trust in SNH (6). No wonder there is much resentment over the activities of this massively expensive, manipulative quango that so seriously lacks the necessary knowledge and expertise to achieve a sensible balance between conserving ecology (so often too finely focussed on single species) and the needs of the people who make their living from it, and who over generations have cared for it well.

©www.land-care.org.uk

References

1. Scottish Natural Heritage (2006). Sound of Arisaig (Loch Ailort t Loch Ceann Traigh) Special Area of Conservation. Advice under Regulation 33(2) of The Conservation (Natural Habitats, etc) Regulations 1994 (as amended).
www.snh.org.uk/pdfs/about/directives/Sound_of_Arisaig.pdf Click Here

2. Irvine, James (2006). Public meeting to consider proposed Coastal and Marine National Park: Mallaig 25th March 2006.
See SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL Homepage, filed 27 Mar 06, www.land-care.org.uk Click Here to View

3. Macleod, Kirsty (2006). Report of Mallaig meeting 25th March to consider proposed Coastal & Marine National Park
See SOCIAL/ECONOMIC/POLITICAL Homepage, filed 02 Apr 06, www.land-care.org.uk Click Here to View

4. Scottish Natural Heritage (2006). SNH advice on coastal and marine national parks. Advice to Scottish Ministers
www.snh.org.uk/pdfs/strategy/natparks/CMNP/advice/CMNPAdvicefinal.pdf Click Here to View

5. Editorial (2003). Re-drafted SNH Scottish Outdoor Access Code pays little heid to consultation responses
See SCOTTISH OUTDOOR ACCESS Homepage, filed 02 Dec 03, www.land-care.org.uk Click Here to View

6. Irvine, James (2003). Does SNH conduct itself as an honest broker or as a political manipulator?
See SCOTTISH OUTDOOR ACCESS Homepage, filed 25 Oct 03, wwwland-care.org.uk Click Here to View