|
Back to ANIMAL WELFARE Homepage
The tagging of cattle:
what are you doing to my calf?
Dr James Irvine
Teviot Scientific, Cultybraggan Farm, Comrie,
Perthshire
Filed 04 July 04
It is inspection time on the farm by officials
from the Scottish Executive Environmental and Rural Department (SEERAD).
Their task is to check the tags in the ears of the cattle, to see
that everything tallies with what their records say that the farm
has and to ensure that any claims for subsidy meet their requirements.
The only means of identification of a bovine that
is acceptable to SEERAD (or DEFRA) continues to be the archaic method
of tags in the animals' ears: one small ministry tag and another
tag that can be read at a distance. Not surprisingly, such tags
get detached from the beasts' ears. There is serious trouble if
a bovine should be found by the officials to be missing both tags.
In such a situation the beast is liable to be rendered valueless
and additional financial penalties are likely to be imposed on the
farmer.
Figure 1:
This limousin cross heifer calf looks
innocent enough but young calves can be very athletic.
It is easier to catch them when they are one or two days old, but
their mothers can be aggressively protective.
The ministry tag is on the left and the larger secondary tag is
on the right.
The tags used here are Shearwell tags, the only supplier I know
who will replace their tags for free should they come out
(For an enlarged picture Click
Here)
It is greatly to be regretted that such painfully
slow progress has been made in terms of the government authorities
agreeing on a suitable microchip to enable them to decide what kind
of microchip - and what information it should hold - would have
their official approval. Also yet to be established is a method
of attaching to the animal whatever tagging device is used so that
it stays with the animal throughout its life. The tag also needs
to be easily read - either visually or by a convenient hand held
computer device - so that it fulfils the needs of the different
people working in the livestock industry, including the farmer,
auctioneer, abattoir and government officials.
As a consequence a great deal of farm staff time
is spent repeatedly checking ear tags in cattle. Generally this
involves bringing the herd off the hill into a holding area and
putting the beasts through a cattle crush so that the tags can be
read by naked eye.
There are electronic tagging systems
available but sadly as yet none of them have official approval.
So even if the farmer has invested in an electronic system, the
animals have also got to carry the mandatory two types of tags in
their ears. It would appear that over the past six years and longer
very little tangible progress has been made in the techniques of
cattle identification.
High risk to stockmen
It is a requirement that all calves be tagged
within twenty days from birth. As healthy calves become incredibly
mobile and strong within a few days, it is usual for the stockman
to try and tag a calf as soon after birth as possible. Otherwise
he may need to bring the whole group of cattle in the field into
a holding area and get the calf into a safe corner.
A good suckler cow has strong
maternal instincts and is liable to attack anyone or anything that
appears to threaten its calf. Any stockman over the years - indeed
centuries - knows that. Yet the Health and Safety Executive has
repeatedly denied any significant hazard until they were recently
forced to do so by an independent body surveying injuries among
livestock farmers.
A livestock farmer is not very likely to report
injuries to himself from his own cattle to the Health and Safety
Executive, as it is understandably perceived that to do such a thing
would only add more trouble to a difficult situation. Basically
the Health and Safety Executive had their heads buried in the sand
when they previously denied that a serious problem exists simply
because they were not receiving official notification. But then
tagging of calves at an early age was government policy, so perhaps
Health and Safety issues were conveniently ignored so as not to
make difficulties in relation to what other government departments
were trying to do.
Figure 2:
What are you doing to my calf?
Note how the ears are forward, the look is intense and there is
frothing at the mouth.
She has probably just finished a heavy session of bawling
(For an enlarged picture Click Here)
Animal stress
The stress to cattle when separated from their
calves can be seen in relatively mild form even when older cattle
are managed in a holding area, being separated from their calves
while tags are checked by stockmen with whom they are familiar (Figure
1).
It is for the same reason that it is so dangerous
for the public to go walking - especially with a dog - through a
field of cows with calves. If a member of the public - either inadvertently
or through ignorance - gets between a cow and its calf, then a vicious
attack on that person is more likely than not even although the
cow is normally of placid nature. In terms of the Land Reform (Scotland)
Act insufficient emphasis is placed on this hazard. Again, the problem
is largely brushed aside: to emphasise it would interfere with the
government's plan to open up virtually all farmland as a public
park with essentially no park keepers (other than the farmers themselves
but who carry no authority as far as the public is concerned).
Finis
|